Kylie v ccma and others
Webcase of Kylie. In Kylie v CCMA, (2008) 29 ILJ 1918 (LC), the Labour Appeal Court in Kylie v CCMA & others had to grapple with the question of whether the definition of an employee extends to persons engaged in unlawful activities. Kylie was employed in a massage parlor as a sex worker; her employer was Michelle Van Zyl (trading under the name WebDespite the prohibition of prostitution under the Sexual Offences Act 23 of 1957 the court concluded that on the basis of the constitutional guarantee of labour rights, Kylie was in an employment relationship 125 See Dube v Classique Panel Beaters [1997] 7 BLLR 868 (IC); Vudhla v Millies Fashions (2003) 24 ILJ 142 (CCMA); Georgiva- Degonova v ...
Kylie v ccma and others
Did you know?
http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10386/1104/mdhluli_p_2014.pdf%3bsequence=1
WebJun 2, 2010 · In South Africa, the Labour Appeal Court handed down judgment on Friday 28 May 2010, in the case of the sex worker (Kylie) who was unfairly dismissed by the brothel employing her (Kylie v CCMA ... WebSouth African Kylie and Discovery HealthLabor Law Protection; court cases have opened the door to much speculation, confusion and debate in this regard, as they haveallowed for …
Web• Discovery Health Limited v CCMA and others [2008] 7 BLLR 633 (LC) [especially paras 20 – 41] • Kylie v CCMA [2010] 7 BLLR 705 (LAC ... Ltd v CCMA 2013 5 BLLR 434 (LAC)’ [2015] PER 4 5. Dismissal [Individual labour law] Textbook • Collier et al Chapters 10 – 14 WebCASE LAW: Kylie v CCMA and others. The Labour Court initially held that a prostitute was not entitled to protection against unfair. dismissal in terms of the LRA as the courts (and …
WebApr 2, 2016 · The discussion further looks at the case of Kylie v CCMA which has been subject to much debate recently. The discussion also ... Discovery Health v CCMA & Others (2008) 29 ILJ 1480 (CC). European Court of Justice , Jany et al v Justitie, C-268/99 of 20.11.2001. Khosa v Minister of Social Development.
WebCCMA & OTHERS Respondent _____ J U D G M E N T _____ DAVIS JA: [1] This is an appeal against the judgment and an order with Cele AJ, handed down in the court a quo on 7 March 2006, pursuant to an application which was brought by appellant in terms of Section 145 ... friends season 2 episode 19 castWebNov 28, 2008 · "Kylie" v CCMA and Others Dismissal: unfair dismissal - statutory right not enforceable Fri, 28/11/2008 - 02:11 Unhappy with the decision that the CCMA had no jurisdiction over her unfair dismissal claim, sex worker "Kylie" took the decision on Review to the Labour Court. Continue Reading Be The First To Get Updates Subscribe Powered by friends season 2 episode 24Web3.2.1 Kylie v CCMA and Others 27 3.2.2 Judgement of the CCMA 27-28 3.2.3 Judgement of the labour court 28-33 ... 3.2.6 The difference between the Discovery Health v CCMA and the 2 . Kylie v CCMA judgements 37-40 3.2.7 The need to extend labour rights to sex workers 40-46 3.2.8 The test applied by the Labour Court upon review 46-49 fbh fichet limitedhttp://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZALCJHB/2015/460.pdf fbhfhhWebThe Court held that the commissioner correctly appreciated that she did not have anypower to set aside the contract but erred in concluding that the agreement between theparties meant that the CCMA did not have jurisdiction to hear the dispute. friends season 2 episode 29http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALAC/2010/8.html fbh filter box mitsubishiWebIn Kylie v CCMA & others,2 the Labour Appeal Court had to grapple with the question of whether the definition of an employee extends to persons engaged in unlawful activities. … friends season 2 episode 22